Privacy policies need an automated decision-making section by 10 December 2026.
Draft yours free

ISO/IEC 42001 or responsible AI certification. Which fits a small business
AI Governance

Australia, November 2026

ISO/IEC 42001 or responsible AI certification. Which fits a small business

One is an international standard for an AI management system, audited by accredited certification bodies. The other is an assessment of how a business governs its use of AI against Australia's AI Ethics Principles. They answer different questions, and a business can hold both.

Responsible AI Australia • 11 Nov 2026 • 7 min read

A small business that is asked how it governs AI is likely to come across two names. One is ISO/IEC 42001, the international standard for an AI management system. The other is Responsible AI certification, which we operate. They are often mentioned in the same sentence, and they are not the same kind of thing. This guide sets out what each one assesses, who does the assessing, what evidence is involved and what a business can show at the end, so the choice can be made on what you are actually being asked for.

What ISO/IEC 42001 is

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is a management system standard for AI. It specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an AI management system, in the same family as ISO 9001 for quality and ISO/IEC 27001 for information security.[1][2] Standards Australia announced its adoption on 16 February 2024, and the Australian text, AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023, is an identical adoption of the international standard.[3][1]

The requirements cover policy, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement. Planning includes AI risk assessment and treatment and an AI system impact assessment process. Performance includes internal audit and management review. Annex A sets out reference control objectives and controls, and Annex B gives implementation guidance for each of them.[1]

Nothing in the standard is reserved for large organisations. Standards Australia's guide for Australian business describes it as applicable to any organisation, regardless of size, type and nature, that provides or uses products or services that use AI systems.[2] It also shares the harmonised structure of other ISO management system standards, so an organisation that already runs ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 9001 can align the two.[1]

Who certifies against ISO/IEC 42001

The standard sets requirements. It does not itself certify anyone. Standards Australia puts it this way: an organisation may adopt the standard for internal conformance or seek third-party assessment through appropriate conformity assessment bodies, and certification arrangements are outside the scope of the text.[1]

In Australia and New Zealand, the bodies that audit and certify management systems are themselves accredited by JASANZ, the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand, which was established by treaty between the two governments in 1991 and provides independent accreditation of conformity assessment bodies.[4] One certification body announced JASANZ accreditation for ISO/IEC 42001 in July 2025.[5]

We do not publish a cost or a timeframe for ISO/IEC 42001 certification. Both depend on the scope of the management system being audited, and certification bodies quote on that scope.

What Responsible AI certification is

Responsible AI certification assesses how an Australian business governs its use of AI. The reference point is the eight Australian AI Ethics Principles, which are voluntary principles published by the Department of Industry, Science and Resources, together with the Responsible AI Pledge in our Certification Rules.[6] It is granted to a business for its practices. It is not an assessment of a particular AI product, model or system.

There are three cumulative tiers. Commit requires a signed Pledge and the questionnaire answered in full. Embed adds a Responsible AI Policy that the business states is implemented across its operations. Govern adds a governance framework covering risk management, oversight roles, impact assessments and accountability. An independent human assessor reviews the evidence, may ask for a video call, and the tier is determined by that assessment rather than chosen by the applicant. The published scope sets out what is checked at each tier and how each answer is assessed.

It operates as a certification trade mark scheme under published Certification Rules, which is a different mechanism from accredited management system certification. Certification lasts 12 months, and every certified business is listed on a public register.

Side by side

The table compares the two on the points a small business usually needs to weigh. Our own column restates the scope page, how certification works and the pricing page.

AspectISO/IEC 42001Responsible AI certification
What is assessedAn AI management system. The requirements cover policy, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation and improvement, with a set of reference controls.[1]A business's responsible AI practices, against the eight Australian AI Ethics Principles and the Responsible AI Pledge, at one of three tiers.
Who assessesA third-party conformity assessment body. In Australia and New Zealand those bodies are accredited by JASANZ.[1][4]An independent human assessor. Responsible AI Australia then determines the tier.
EvidenceThe documented management system, including AI risk assessment and treatment, AI system impact assessments, internal audit and management review.[1]The questionnaire and a signed Pledge at Commit, a Responsible AI Policy at Embed, and a governance framework at Govern. Answers are declared by the business and reviewed. Documents are read.
Typical effortEstablishing and operating the management system, then an audit by the certification body. Certification bodies quote cost and time on the scope of the system.An online application of about 20 minutes, then assessment. Most certifications complete in two to four weeks. No cost to apply, and an annual licence from AUD $349.
What you can show afterwardsCertification of conformance to ISO/IEC 42001, issued by the certification body.[2]Your tier, a certificate and certification ID, a public register profile, a signed verifiable credential, and a 12-month licence to use the certification trade mark in its approved forms.
How others verify itBy asking for the certificate and checking the accreditation of the body that issued it.On the public register, through the verification link for the certification ID, or with the free verification API.

Where the two meet

The two sit in the same landscape and point at the same Australian reference material. Standards Australia's guide says ISO/IEC 42001 is not a replacement for an organisation's existing frameworks and guidelines but a complementary document, and that in Australia it complements existing frameworks and guides including Australia's AI Ethics Principles.[2]

The National AI Centre's Guidance for AI Adoption is the other common thread. Its implementation guidance sets out six essential practices and asks organisations to assign accountability for the operation of the AI management system, which is the language of a management system standard.[7] Responsible AI certification maps its questionnaire to the same six practices on the scope page, with what is covered and what is not covered under each one. That map is a statement of what relates to what. It is not a conformance claim.

Responsible AI certification does not assess conformance with ISO/IEC 42001. Conformance with that standard is assessed by accredited auditors under it. The two are designed to sit alongside each other, and neither replaces the other.

Where each one fits

The useful question is what you are being asked for, and by whom.

  • A customer or tender names ISO/IEC 42001. Then that is the answer. No other certification stands in for conformance with a named standard.
  • You already run an ISO management system. ISO/IEC 42001 shares the harmonised structure of ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001, and Standards Australia notes that organisations can align it with existing ISO programs.[1]
  • You have many AI systems and teams to coordinate. In the Standards Australia guide, Professor Lyria Bennett Moses of UNSW describes certification as particularly helpful in larger organisations, with all the systems, processes and policies that need to be coordinated.[2]
  • You are a small team using AI tools. The Commit tier of Responsible AI certification was designed as an entry point for a business at this stage. It reviews the governance you have, starting with a signed Pledge and a completed questionnaire, and it does not require a management system to be in place first.
  • You want something a customer can check. A Responsible AI certification is listed on a public register with its tier and the business's questionnaire responses, subject to the redactions the Rules allow, so a customer can read what was assessed.

These are not exclusive. A business can hold both, and you can note any ISO or other certification you already hold when you apply. A small business that starts with the Australian principles and later needs a certified management system will still need that system audited by a conformity assessment body.

Both also have edges. Neither one tests an AI product, and neither one decides what a particular law requires of you. The scope page describes this as where certification stops and other assurance begins, and the certification overview summarises what a certified business receives.

Questions people ask

Is Responsible AI certification the same as ISO/IEC 42001 certification?

No. ISO/IEC 42001 is an international standard for an AI management system, and conformance is assessed by third-party conformity assessment bodies. Responsible AI certification assesses a business's responsible AI practices against the eight Australian AI Ethics Principles at one of three tiers. They are different assessments of different things, and a business can hold both.

Can a small business be certified to ISO/IEC 42001?

The standard does not set a size threshold. Standards Australia's guide describes it as applicable to any organisation, regardless of size, type and nature, that provides or uses products or services that use AI systems. Whether it suits a particular small business depends on what its customers ask for and whether it is ready to establish and operate a management system.

Does Responsible AI certification count towards ISO/IEC 42001?

No. Responsible AI certification is assessed against the Australian AI Ethics Principles and its own published tier criteria, and it makes no finding about conformance with ISO/IEC 42001. A business that later builds an AI management system will need that system audited by a conformity assessment body.

How much does ISO/IEC 42001 certification cost?

We do not publish a figure. The cost and time depend on the scope of the management system being audited, and certification bodies quote on that scope. Ask an accredited certification body for a quote.

Who accredits ISO/IEC 42001 certification bodies in Australia?

JASANZ, the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand, is the accreditation body established by treaty between the Australian and New Zealand governments in 1991. It provides independent accreditation of conformity assessment bodies.

Do I need both?

Not necessarily. They answer different questions and can sit alongside each other. If a customer or tender names ISO/IEC 42001, that is what they are asking for. If you want your governance of AI independently reviewed against the Australian AI Ethics Principles and listed on a public register, that is what Responsible AI certification does.

Go deeper

Sources

  1. Standards Australia, Spotlight on AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Artificial intelligence, Management system (5 September 2025)
  2. Standards Australia, Understanding 42001: AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Guide for Australian Business
  3. Standards Australia adopts the international standard for AI Management System, AS ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (16 February 2024)
  4. Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand
  5. Intertek, Intertek achieves global JAS-ANZ accreditation for ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System (30 July 2025)
  6. Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Australia's AI Ethics Principles
  7. National AI Centre, Guidance for AI Adoption: implementation guidance

This guide is general information, not legal advice. It restates official instruments and regulator guidance as they stood on 11 November 2026. How a rule applies to a particular organisation is a judgement for its own adviser.